  Or something like that. NRO has a good urlLink article out about Bush hating. Here's an excerpt: Another common error is the idea that a connection equals a cause — call it the Michael Moore Fallacy.
Bush bashers invariably point to his family's business dealings with the oil-rich Saudi royal family, or to Dick Cheney's former job as head of the oil company Halliburton, and therefore assume that the administration's policies toward Iraq are dictated primarily by the fact that the country sits on billions of gallons of oil. But playing connect-the-dots in order to prove someone's motives is always tricky, and often absurd. For example: Noam Chomsky's book sales have skyrocketed since the invasion of Iraq; Chomsky teaches at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; MIT is a major contractor for the Department of Defense; the Iraqi war strengthens the Defense Department requests for budget increases....
Therefore, Noam Chomsky conspired with the Defense Department to convince President Bush to invade Iraq. 
