  Man oh man. The BC team can't even successfully issue a terror warning without escaping serious and warranted scrutiny. What's the deal? The LAST thing we want is to make it look in any way as though our side is politicizing something as fundementally and importantly non-political as evaluating and reporting terror threats.
But these days it seems that we're damned if we do and damned if we don't. Raise the warning level and we are criticized of politicizing terrorism. Don't raise the warning level and, well, we're not making the country safe in the face of new threats. This sounds like one of those game theory matrices in which the dominant strategy is an inefficient outcome. 
