  JONAH GOLDBERG MIGHT NOT BE WRONG. Paul over at Wizbang writes: Last night I got a phone call with some information about Nick Berg. Much of which I posted last night. Some of it I have not run with because I don't trust it as much as I trusted the password story.
I won't post the rest yet, but I'll say this about it. We know nothing about the time between when he left Iraqi (U.S.? ) custody and when he showed up in an orange jumpsuit. If my source is correct about what happened, it raises considerable questions about Nick Berg. In all honesty, is it really responsible, ethical, or even decent, to make such a charge WITHOUT disclosing the information that leads one to reach that conclusion?
If you want to say that you have info that "raises serious questions"--fine. Post that information and let the readers make up their minds whether it raises such questions. Otherwise, it's just rumor-mongering and speculation. If you DON'T want to disclose the information--then don't claim that there are "serious questions" about Nick Berg caused by anything other than what is publicly available. UPDATE : I wrongly failed to link the post in question--my error. Here is Paul's post urlLink in toto 
