  Although I'm not attracted by or to men, never have been, I suppose it's only fair that I define myself as a homosexual by conviction, even if that sounds weird, coming from a non-practicing heterosexual, by definition. For one, I sincerely consider the propagation of homosexuality an invaluable remedy against further growth of global over-population, which is after all an increasingly serious problem. I really mean that, despite the irrevocable fact that I won't ever be able to undergo the transition required in order to live up to that conviction. I really couldn't, even if I wanted to [which I do, though only by reason]. In spite of that limitation, homosexuals have my wholehearted support, and I'm not being sarcastic. I feel I had to add that, as afore argumentation would suit the homophobic to a tee. Secondly, I've seen too many incompetent bitches come into existence in the aftermath of the promotion of women. I'll be careful not to generalise, since exceptions to that rule definitely exist, how few they may be. The overall impression though, is that a lot of women tend to believe that success in the corporate world provides a certain toughness, as that is what they think is the case among men. Also, I'm quite convinced that some women executives consider it necessary to discriminate men in order to counteract the historic discrimination of women. While claiming to oppose discrimination, modern days suffragettes in effect oppose discrimination against women alone, as women's liberation in their view equals suppression of men. This may sound strange, coming from a man who officially [i.e. on behalf of his employers] has championed dissemination of female top executives and members of boards of directors.
Well, what is a man to do? It is the flavour of the decade, and as such something I'm compelled to follow up in article after article printed in the human resources management magazine I edit on a regular basis, rendering me an accomplice to the militant feminists' quest for the suppression of the male species. Get this right though: I'm as little supportive of the discrimination of women as that of men, but I think I've made that clear, haven't I? Finally, I've come to despise women's general opportunism and disloyal nature. I'm beginning to think that generated experiences have left me an approver of urlLink August Strindberg 's heartfelt misogyny.
One is almost tempted to support urlLink Men for justice , but just almost . I suspect that the organisation harbours a wife batterer and a rapist or two [not that it intends to]. You have to give urlLink these fine ladies some credit though, for proving that there are exceptions to the afore mentioned rule.
Although it may just be overdoing it a little. So you see, in claiming that I wish I was able to convert to homosexuality, I'm everything but entirely dishonest. That's how I define homosexual by conviction . Unfortunately, convictions are based on pure reason, whereas emotions are an altogether different matter. In that department I'm afraid I'm still incorrigibly heterosexual, although I keep asking myself why. 
