  NOT THAT IT MATTERS Hmm, it's March 19th, and urlLink we're at war ... It is at times like this that I must look to my leader and commander-in-chief for an example.
At a news conference a couple of weeks ago, George W Bush said he would call for a vote on a second UN resolution regardless of the chances of passage. He wanted a "whip count", for people to "show their cards", and other homespun expressions, etc. Instead he hid in the Azores and talked -- for one whole hour , how's that for Potsdam Part Deux -- with the only two relevant people on earth who agree with him, and then snuck the resolution off the table, regardless of his promise.
So now we have to get behind Bush, right? Right. With that in mind, I am hereby following his example. Meaning: no carbonated beverage for Mr Barron. If he doesn't like it, that means he's going against the example set by his president. (i could have also mentioned that I require a 2nd resolution, one that actually has language prescribing force in it, but the dubya thing will have to do) 
